How featured articles are chosen

Up to now, the criteria has been simple: nice image plus decent introductory description (decent grammar and spelling). I've tried to carefully place the <onlyinclude> </onlyinclude> tags and occasionally did some minor grammar and spelling fixes. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 5:44 PM PST 7 Jul 2009


Please put your nominations below in the following form:
  • [[article_link]] &mdash; Reason you think article deserves to be featured. --signature
  • Mathusala, The Scarlet Hero because its my only work that i think actually deserves the feature title.----Mathusala0 12:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
    (on a side note Mortimer can go ahead and have it removed hes not going to be finished any time soon)
    • Okay, I will switch out Mortimer and add Mathusala, The Scarlet Hero. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 10:29 AM PST 8 Jul 2009
    • Done (awhile ago). -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 6:09 PM PST 17 Jul 2009
  • Aviare - Well written background with care for grammar and spelling. See how featured article version (uses only some excerpts) looks at WoWRP:Featured_article/singletest. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 11:16 AM PST 21 Jun 2010
  • Melkorius Galahand looks pretty good. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 24 Apr 2012 4:14 PM Pacific
  • Arthaban is well done. -- Fandyllic (talk · contr) 24 Apr 2012 4:14 PM Pacific
  • Gremmosh - Forgive me for promoting myself, but I feel that the level of content I have put into this page is warranted for Featured Status (based strictly on the average level of content I see elsewhere). I'll leave this up to the community to decide however, and thank you for your consideration. Accepting all criticisms regarding such. {{SUBST:User:Jpsblue/Sig1}} 22:18, June 29, 2016 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.